Alex Soojung-Kim Pang, Ph.D.

I study people, technology, and the worlds they make

Month: September 2004 (page 1 of 5)

Grover Norquist on the Greatest Generation

[T]he age cohort that is most Democratic and most pro-statist, are those people who turned 21 years of age between 1932 and 1952-Great Depression, New Deal, World War II-Social Security, the draft-all that stuff. That age cohort is now between the ages of 70 and 90 years old, and every year 2 million of them die. So 8 million people from that age cohort have passed away since the last election; that means, net, maybe 1 million Democrats have disappeared-and even the Republicans in that age group….

This is an age cohort that voted for a draft before the war started, and allowed the draft to continue for 25 years after the war was over. Their idea of the legitimate role of the state is radically different than anything previous generations knew, or subsequent generations. Before that generation, whenever you put a draft in, there were draft riots. After that generation, there were draft riots. This generation? No problem. Why not? Of course the government moves people around like pawns on a chessboard. One side spits off labor law, one side spits off Social Security. We will all work until we’re 65 and have the same pension. You know, some Bismarck, German thing, okay? Very un-American. Very unusual for America. The reaction to Great Depression, World War II, and so on: Centralization-not as much centralization as the rest of the world got, but much more than is usual in America. We’ve spent a lot of time dismantling some of that and moving away from that level of regimentation. (Grover Norquist, quoted in the Weekly Standard)

It reminds me a bit of the scene in Dr. Zhivago where the military commander and political officer of the unit that Zhivago was dragooned into are arguing over whether the doctor should be released or not. The political officer warns that in the future, every soldier will be judged not just by his service, but by his political purity, too. Never mind what you’ve sacrificed: do we think you have the right politics?

Forget saving the world. They became Democrats. They deserve to have their Social Security privatized.

Neal Stephenson at Keplers

This evening I went to Keplers, my local independent bookstore (as they keep reminding me), to hear Neal Stephenson read from The System of the World, the final volume of his Baroque cycle.

The crowd was what you would expect for a science fiction/early modern history reading: a mix of people who knew each other at Xerox PARC during the glory days of the 1970s; a few escapees from a Dungeons & Dragons convention; a sprinking of gentle-looking, grey-haired folks who memorized every second of Neil Young’s Decade; and a fair number of twentysomethings who memorized every second of Radiohead’s Kid A. And then me.

Neal was pretty entertaining: laid back but energetic, and good with the questions. When asked a question about his female characters, he replied, “That would require some self-analysis. I don’t do that, out of fear that it might break something.” (Or something close. All quotes are approximate.) A number of people asked questions about how he writes, to which he replied that writing isn’t a “lofty art,” but instead is “more like a craft, or an athletic event.” I couldn’t agree more.

He also writes two or three hours a day, no more. And yet he can write 1200-page books.

Pictures may come later, though they’re not terribly exciting. Basically, there’s one of Neal signing a book. Then there’s another one of him signing another book. Then, there’s an out of focus one of him signing a book. Then, a picture with someone’s back obscuring Neal signing a book.

It was fun to go to the event. He’s been to Keplers several times, so I now have autographed copies of all three volumes of the series. Though their status as precious artifacts has probably kept me from rereading them as aggressively as I might; I’ll have to buy the paperbacks and start over again.

I have a hard time following all the plot lines, and the intricacies of who is who; but at the same time, I think the books are one of the most brilliant explorations of the connection between natural philosophy and finance, and of the deep intellectual currents that link early modern science, technology and commerce, that I’ve ever encountered. And while I’m not an early modernist, I’ve read more than my share of that stuff, going back to Merton and Hessen. For many authors, the connection between science and commerce existed at a pretty high level: Hessen’s argument that Newtonianism was a response to the problems of long-distance trade and a burgeoning military is characteristic. Of course, a younger generation has made this picture more complex, but I think Stephenson’s work still stands out for its argument of subtle similiarities in the way some savants came to look upon money, information, and nature.

And maybe in this volume I’ll finally find out what’s up with Enoch Root (whose appearance in the first pages of Quicksilver immediately got me hooked on the series).

Signs of overspecialization in the consulting business

From Craigslist:

Nude Economic Consulting to trade for?????

Musicals as religion

I’m not sure what this explains:

Academic claims musicals are the new religion

It’s God who really has the best songs, according to a University of St Andrews theologian - at least, if you disregard The Sound of Music.

The Rev Ian Bradley from the school of divinity believes musicals like Les Miserables and The Lion King provide their audiences with a distinct philosophy of life, as well as entertainment.

So what does this make Andrew Lloyd Weber? Our Augustine?

Voting in Flordia

Another amazing article about voting in Florida, and how a blend of new technologies, political jockeying, and a long tradition of creative voting are coming together to create a very large mess.

[via Wired News]

Our visual age

This is pretty weird…

Boing Boing: Iraq visual language survival guides for military personnel

The images are functional icons, like highway signs or web UI buttons, so they reflect a simplified aesthetic — like early childhood storybooks. The subject matter is violent, but the look is “see spot run” or “happy Lego people at play.” The most surreal one is a two-part diagram in which a man is asked to remove his toupee so the interrogator can determine whether or not weapons are stashed beneath.

I especially like the fact that the motto of Kwikpoint, the company that makes the visual guide, is “Communication is the key to world peace.”

It’s like something from Get Your War On, brought into the real world.

Oh wait, that happens all the time.

Got laptop?

A sign at Denver International Airport, which you see after you pass through security and head toward the terminals.

I wish they’d had one of those in Tahoe.

SIMS lecture series

It’s probably silly to puff a lecture series that you’ve spoken in, but I’m very impressed by the fall lineup for UC Berkeley SIMS’ Distinguished Lecture Series. It’s a very diverse, interesting group of speakers, and a good audience- even though Berkeley has SO many different things going on, it’s easy for people to get overloaded and just hang out at Cafe Milano. Check it out if you’re there.

Hey, participation in democracy!

Whatever happens in the November elections, this article from Salon is good news:

New voters are flooding local election offices with paperwork, registering in significantly higher numbers than four years ago as attention to the presidential election runs high and an array of activist groups recruit would-be voters who could prove critical come Nov. 2.

Are families companies?

Slate has a critical piece on Dr. Phil’s new book on parenting.

Having worked in a company that was described by its employees as a dysfunctional family, I was struck by the fact that

The guiding assumption of Dr. Phil’s “step-by-step plan” to help parents become “system managers” at home is that families are just that: systems, in which everybody—from hubby on down to baby—has a role to play. In place of Spockian empathy, we have corporate efficiency for the dual-income family whirlwind. The manual features seven parenting “tools,” checklists to fill out, “audits” to conduct—and even a downloadable “behavioral contract” so parent and kid can spell out a disciplinary deal, in the hope that neither will get angry or whiny when a party fails to comply. “Accountability” along with “consistency” are the watchwords of the behaviorist approach.

But the existence of such tools doesn’t automatically mean that good results come out: you can have Enrons as well as Intels.

And is it the case that maybe, just maybe, some parts of our existence shouldn’t be subject to the kinds of rules that we have in the workplace? Discipline and consistency are great- I try to have them at home, too- but I’m deeply skeptical that my kids would benefit from having signed contracts. You want your kids to internalize these kinds of things, not depend on external tools for them.

And contracts are renegotiable, and rarely can be comprehensive enough to cover all contingencies- a fact that most children are really good at discovering and exploiting. The end result, ironically, can be a world in which you no longer act according to moral precepts and judgments, but according to explicit rules: a world in which you have no fixed rules, nothing you can’t potentially get away with.

Older posts

© 2017 Alex Soojung-Kim Pang, Ph.D.

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑