Alex Soojung-Kim Pang, Ph.D.

I study people, technology, and the worlds they make

Month: February 2005 (page 1 of 5)

Get me some of that!

Kyocera’s new ads are fun. But now I really want to try vacuum messaging. (Needs broadband.)

[via Jason, of course]

[To the tune of Radiohead, “Lurgee,” from the album “Pablo Honey”.]

Jef Raskin RIP

Jef Raskin, the original force behind Apple’s Macintosh, died this weekend. I interviewed Jef a couple years ago, when I was working on a project on the history of the Macintosh for the Stanford Library. At the time, Jef was working for some dot-com, and his office was just across the street from Apple world headquarters (ironically); his book The Humane Interface had either just come out, or was about to.

The first time we met, we sat in his office (at Telocity, I think) for a couple hours, talking about his background and work on the Mac; we then had lunch, and Jef mainly talked about model planes. As an oral historian, I tend to default to listening mode around people I’m interested in; but I get the sense that in most conversations, Jef probably did most of the talking. He had a vast array of interests, and pursued some of them very seriously: his home office was tucked away behind what looked like a machine shop and small airplane assembly plant, and upstairs was a small pipe organ.

I visited his house a couple times, to go through his papers- mainly a fruitless search for a memo that either he wrote to refute Larry Tesler’s argument in favor of multibutton mice, or that Larry wrote to refute Jef’s argument in favor of multibutton mice (each was pretty sure he had written it, but neither could find a copy any longer)- and talk about The Humane Interface, which was already getting some pretty positive coverage. During one of those visits, in order to make good use of the time, I ended up doing part of an interview with him while he drove his kids to music lessons in San Francisco. Getting folded into a family’s routine is not the sort of thing that usually happens when you do an interview.

Jef had a reputation for being arrogant, brusque, and generally having a poor interface (ironic, given his work). He struck me very impatient with the stupidity of the world, and certain in many of his opinions; but I also found him a lot more likeable, and friendly in a gruff kind of way, than I expected. Basically, anyone who spent any time around academics or scientists would have recognized the personality type. And it is impossible to argue with his basic claim that computers are still a lot harder to use than they should be, and that many of the fixes are pretty straightforward, but not done because of established practice, legacy code, or because most computer companies don’t really care about users.

Jef had co-founded a Center for Humane Interfaces that recently got some seed money. I don’t know what’s going to happen to it, but the world will be the worse if his ideas don’t catch on.

Jef is the second Mac veteran I interviewed who has died since the project: Jim Sachs, one of the developers of the Apple mouse, died in 2002. Having worked mainly on Victorian science, where your subjects are safely gone, I find it’s a disconcerting thing. Jim and Jef were extremely different, but arguably they were two of the most brilliant people to work on the Mac, and deserve to be remembered more prominently as thinkers and contributors to the evolution of the computer. I suppose in some small way those interviews will help.

Jon Carroll, eco-grandpa

A birthday party is sort of like a rain forest; the adults are up in the canopy with the monkeys, and the kids are down on the ground with the gigantic insects. If a birthday party goes well… the two ecologies rarely interact. (from today’s column)

[good catch, Craig!]

[To the tune of The Doors, “The End,” from the album “The Doors”.]

Connect the dots

Now, where’s my bling bling (whatever that is)?

Rappers and Bloggers- Separated at birth!

For starters, both groups share a love of loose-fitting, pajama-style apparel. Still not satisfied? Bloggers and rappers are equally obsessed with social networking. Every rapper rolls with his entourage; every blogger rolls with his blog roll. Women can’t win an audience in either profession without raunching it up like Lil’ Kim or Wonkette….

And don’t forget those silly, silly names. Even if he didn’t flaunt his devotion to pimping and pit bulls, you’d probably guess Snoop Dogg is a rapper. And Fedlawyerguy—yeah, probably a blogger. But the “blogger or rapper?” parlor game can stump even the nerdiest gangsta. Does uggabugga despise wack emcees or wack Charles Krauthammer? What about Mad Kane? Big Noyd, Justus League, Uppity Negro, Little Brother, Cold Fury, and South Knox Bubba? (Answers: blogger, blogger, rapper, rap group, blogger, rap group, blogger, blogger.)

Essentially, blogging is sampling plus a new riff. Political bloggers take a story in the news, rip out a few chunks, and type out a few comments…. For rappers and bloggers, each theft is worth celebrating, another loose item to slap onto the collage.

Rap music and blogging are populist, low-cost-of-entry communication forms that reward self-obsessed types who love writing in first person.

[To the tune of Wild Cherry, “Play That Funky Music,” from the album “Wild Cherry”.]

This is cool

Million-man world cities, a demo using Mikel Maron’s Worldkit, which I’ve got to play around with sometime. Check out how all those red dots flourish after 1900.

Revelation of the day

“Librarians are more socially outgoing than academics?” (Household Opera, “The ‘single woman in a rural college town’ blues“)

Review is off

I sent off the review this morning. Yet another line on the c.v.. And if I’m going to read books, I might as well get as much out of it as I can.

On the nightstand

I’m putting together the last paragraph of a review for the LA Times Book Review, my home away from home- a piece on one of several books coming out this year on our exciting nanotech-enhanced, radically extended, cyborgish future. This particular book isn’t that great on the social implications, nor does it really engage the arguments of critics of biotechnology like Leon Kass and Bill McKibben; but it does make me take a little more seriously a subject that I’d always found a little too science fiction-y for my taste.

I’m also finishing Andrew Parker’s In the Blink of an Eye, on the role of vision in the “Cambrian explosion.” It’s something I picked up a couple weekends ago, while the children were at Story Time at our local bookstore.

There aren’t many events in history that only happen once, but the appearance of vision is one. “The light switch was turned on, for the first and only time- and it has been on ever since” in the Cambrian, as Parker puts it. It reminds me of Eric Havelock’s work, about the first and last time that alphabetic writing is invented and changes a society. And it makes me wonder: is there such a first-and-last change that’s happening now?

Fun weekend ahead

I spent most of today either sleeping or in a flu-induced haze… one of my kids fell asleep uncharacteristically early… and the other just woke up a few minutes ago complaining that "the covers hurt." I wonder what the long weekend is going to be like….

Computer science humor

Something from the EnVision05 conference that I’d meant to blog, but forgot to: We visisted the NASA Supercomputing Center (there are some pictures of it on my Flickr account), and got to see a big wall of monitors that they’ve built, a giant 7 x 7 display. The NASA guys were answering various questions about what they do with it, whether it’s more useful to put up on really honkin’ big image that covers all the screens, or a range of images- say, a variety of results from a simulation. (They came out in favor to the latter.)

One of the guys said, “But the best thing is, we can run 49 debuggers at once!”

That brought the house down.

P.S. No, I don’t really get it, either.

[To the tune of Radiohead, “Ripcord,” from the album “Pablo Honey”.]

Older posts

© 2017 Alex Soojung-Kim Pang, Ph.D.

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑