Alex Soojung-Kim Pang, Ph.D.

I study people, technology, and the worlds they make

Month: September 2008 (page 1 of 4)

Fourteen versions of “Little Wing”

[Recently I came looked for this piece that I’d published on Future Now in 2005. Since Future Now has moved, I decided to repost it here.]

One of my all-time favorite songs is Sting’s version of the classic Jimi Hendrix song “Little Wing,” which he recorded on Nothing Like the Sun. (The solo by Hiram Bullock is one of the very best performances in the crowded rock pantheon of great guitar work.) It’s also very different from the two best-known versions of the song, Hendrix’s original and Derek and the Dominos’ cover (each of which is very different from the other), much jazzier and quieter.

This evening, after a long meeting at my kids’ school, I visited the Internet Archive’s Live Music archive, and looked around for other versions of “Little Wing.” The Internet Archive is a pretty remarkable resource: it has several thousand Grateful Dead concerts, for starters, and every song in the archive is free. Turns out there are about 50, recorded all around the U.S., spanning more than a decade, by a bunch of bands you’ve probably never heard of.

So I now have a playlist on my iPod that consists of nothing but different covers of “Little Wing:” acoustic folksy version, hard-edged blues versions, versions that were clearly derived from the Hendrix performance, versions that were clearly derived from the Derek and the Dominos (there are almost dueling interpretive schools devoted to this single song)…. I could listen to the same song- and yet not quite the same song- for about three hours.

Oh, and I bought one version on iTunes, the Corrs’ intimate, Celtic-inflected cover.

Strange? Slightly obsessed? Perhaps (and just the kind of behavior you want in a researcher). But I think the Internet Archive, and the relationship between its offerings and what’s available on commercial services, tells us something about the future of user-created content and its relationship to more conventional media.

Blogs are not going to compete with newspapers; cell phone cameras aren’t going to replace photojournalists; and the Internet Archive’s music database isn’t going to kill iTunes. Ultimately, they’re going to occupy different niches, and play off each other, because user-created media is going to be best at capturing performances, events, conversations, and other things you might think of as valuable ephemera: things that can be quite worth preserving, but have an element of unpredictability about them.

For me, a great example is conference talks. There are lots of really mediocre conference talks, and some terrible ones; but there are some that are great, and a few that generate some terrific discussions afterwards. But what happens to that moment, or to those conversations? In the past, if you were lucky, the people who were in the room would remember what a great job you did, and how engaged and excited everyone was by your performance and the ideas that were generated. Now, though, thanks to the miracle of conference blogging, it’s relatively easy to both record and retrieve such moments- and to build on them later.

Likewise, 99.99% of cell phone camera pictures won’t be newsworthy; even mobs of users aren’t likely to put any photojournalists out of work. But they can have three virtues. One is immediacy- the sense, reinforced by the very amateurishness of the production, that You Are There. Another is multiplicity- having lots of cameras providing multiple perspectives on a single event. Third, and most important over the long run, is simple presence: just being at an event that a reporter isn’t).

The same relationship will hold for music on sites like the Internet Archive. There are a million phenomenal concerts that live on in the memories of the people who were there, but are never heard by the rest of the world. To take one example more or less at random, one song I recently downloaded is a cover of “I Shall Be Released” by a performance by a folk/bluegrass/etc. band named Cornmeal, recorded at a memorial concert for a friend of theirs. I have no idea who the band is, and don’t know if I’ll go back and get more of their music, but this version of “I Shall Be Released,” played in memory of a friend and fellow musician, is tremendous- one of those small moments that deserves to be preserved. ABC will cover a presidential press conference, no matter how dull it is; on the other hand, Sony Music is never going to record a show in some small club in San Francisco (not to mention Asheville, Williamstown, Eugene, Biloxi, Austin, Lower Merion…), no matter how good it is. Likewise, Marcus Eaton’s acoustic version of “Little Wing,” or any of Zero’s more free jazz/bluesy versions, aren’t going to replace Derek and the Dominos: an individual performance may be terrific, and it’s interesting to see how different artists reinterpret the same song, but Eaton and Zero need the classic recordings to, as it were, play off of.

All the talk of blogs replacing newspapers, or bottom-up media destroying top-down media, is wrong. Each can do things well that the other cannot; and ultimately they’ll end up complementing each other more than they compete.

It really IS…

…the world’s greatest pie chart.

[via Daniel Pink]

Reading about Tom Ford while Rome burns

Looking over various contacts‘ Twitter feeds from tonight, it looks like I’m the only person who wasn’t liveblogging the presidential debate. I actually watched most of it, then switched to a Guardian article about Tom Ford. Consequently my Twitter stream makes me look only slightly more in touch than, say, one of Paris Hilton’s ex-boyfriends.

links for 2008-09-26

  • "The era of the American Internet is ending.

    Invented by American computer scientists during the 1970s, the Internet has been embraced around the globe. During the network’s first three decades, most Internet traffic flowed through the United States. In many cases, data sent between two locations within a given country also passed through the United States.

    Engineers who help run the Internet said that it would have been impossible for the United States to maintain its hegemony over the long run because of the very nature of the Internet; it has no central point of control. And now, the balance of power is shifting. Data is increasingly flowing around the United States, which may have intelligence — and conceivably military — consequences."

    (tags: Internet technology China politics IT globalization intelligence infrastructure)

  • Duncan Watts on social networks, popularity, and the predictability of life. "Our desire to believe in an orderly universe leads us to interpret the uncertainty we feel about the future as nothing but a consequence of our current state of ignorance, to be dispelled by greater knowledge or better analysis. But even a modest amount of randomness can play havoc with our intuitions…. But just because we now know that something happened doesn’t imply that we could have known it was going to happen at the time, even in principle, because at the time, it wasn’t necessarily going to happen at all.

    "That doesn’t mean we should stop trying to anticipate the future, any more than we should stop trying to make sense of the past. But it does mean that we should treat both the predictions and the explanations we are served — whether about the next hit single, the next great company or even the next war — with the skepticism they deserve."

    (tags: social networks culture future)

  • "It's nearly 40 years old but one leading research company says the days of the computer mouse are numbered."

    (tags: interface technology computer mouse HCI endofcyberspace)

Gartner analyst predicts end of the mouse

This BBC News piece is from a couple months ago, but still, as someone who's written about Stanford, IDEO, and the design of the Apple mouse, it caught my eye…

Say goodbye to the computer mouse

It's nearly 40 years old but one leading research company says the days of the computer mouse are numbered.

A Gartner analyst predicts the demise of the computer mouse in the next three to five years.

Taking over will be so called gestural computer mechanisms like touch screens and facial recognition devices.

"The mouse works fine in the desktop environment but for home entertainment or working on a notebook it's over," declared analyst Steve Prentice.

He told BBC News that his prediction is driven by the efforts of consumer electronics firm which are making products with new interactive interfaces inspired by the world of gaming….

So just how ready are people to wave their hands in the air or make faces at devices with embedded video readers?

Gartner's Mr Prentice says millions are already doing it thanks to machines like Nintendo's Wii and smartphones like the iPhone….

[But not everything may change.] "For all its faults, the keyboard will remain the primary text input device," he said. "Nothing is easily going to replace it. But the idea of a keyboard with a mouse as a control interface is the paradigm that I am talking about breaking down."

Another reminder of how the Internet is connected to nations

From the New York Times, John Markoff on the changing geography of the Internet:

Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S.

The era of the American Internet is ending.

Invented by American computer scientists during the 1970s, the Internet has been embraced around the globe. During the network’s first three decades, most Internet traffic flowed through the United States. In many cases, data sent between two locations within a given country also passed through the United States.

Engineers who help run the Internet said that it would have been impossible for the United States to maintain its hegemony over the long run because of the very nature of the Internet; it has no central point of control.

And now, the balance of power is shifting. Data is increasingly flowing around the United States, which may have intelligence — and conceivably military — consequences.

links for 2008-09-25

The kind of thing I didn’t see when I was in South Africa

But my friends did:

Do things talk?

Thomas points us to this response to the whole "things that talk" literature. A snippet:

Letting the things become actors and intentionalities allow for the maintaining of a variety of scholarly tools and languages, while still appearing to do something new. Thus, rather than exploring the presence and effects of things as things, they are turned into something which we, as academics, can relate to immediately through our training, our languages and our perspectives on the world.

To me, it seems parallel to what happened with the body in a lot of recent body theory (which I have written about elsewhere) – the work of Judith Butler springs to mind as an example – in which the problem of the body and materiality is raised specifically, but then it is subsequently, through philosophical tinkering, made into a subset of problems about language and consciousness. Thus, materiality is seemingly both explained and explained away, and analytical business continues as usual.

Thanks, Thomas!

If Things Can Talk, What Do They Say?

Natalie Jeremijenko, "If Things Can Talk, What Do They Say? If We Can Talk to Things, What Do We Say?" electronic book review (2005).

 

Voice Chips and their newer partners, speech recognition chips, are small low power silicon chips that synthesize voice, play prerecorded voice messages, or recognize voice commands. Although this functionality is not new, what makes voice chips unique is that they are small and cheap enough to be deployed in many, in fact almost any, product. Sprinkled throughout the technosocial landscape, their presence in products is a (not quite arbitrary) sampling mechanism, and enables us to compare very different products. So their secondary function, the concern of this essay, is as a simple instrument to slice through the history of our attempts to swap attributes with machines and be able to understand the nuances of complex sociotechnical systems — precisely because the systems are rendered in the form in which we can best recognize nuance: English, be it our own or the machines'….

 

The question we begin with is simply, when things can talk, what do they say?

Older posts

© 2017 Alex Soojung-Kim Pang, Ph.D.

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑